Skip to content
Back to engagements
North America 2016 – present National · multi-stakeholder Long-running governance

Standards collaborative for a national digital-health authority

Design and stewardship of a multi-stakeholder standards council coordinating standards adoption across a national digital-health portfolio.

Role

Council chair (past) · continuing advisor

Region

North America

Period

2016 – present

Scale

National · multi-stakeholder

The programme

A national digital-health authority in North America needed a standing multi-stakeholder collaborative to coordinate standards adoption across a national portfolio spanning ministries, agencies, clinical professional bodies, and delivery organisations. The collaborative had to be authoritative enough for programmes to defer to and light enough not to strangle them.

The role

Ron served as founding chair of the collaborative and, after handing the chair to a successor, has continued as a senior advisor. The scope covered:

  • charter design: decision rights, quorum, tie-break, appeal, publication;
  • working-group structure: how technical work was actually done and how it fed into council decisions;
  • release calendar: how the standards portfolio would be versioned, deprecated, and stewarded over time;
  • successor development: recruiting and mentoring the next chair and vice-chair.

The craft

Two decisions worth naming:

  1. A short, published charter. The charter is under twenty pages. Every clause exists because a real dispute or a foreseeable dispute made it necessary. Nothing in it is decorative. Councils that need long charters usually die of them.
  2. Successor as a design goal. From the first day, the collaborative was designed to survive its founding chair. Vice-chairs were rotated. Working-group leads were rotated. Meeting facilitation was rotated. By year three the collaborative could operate without any single person in the room.

The outcome

The collaborative is still running today, several chairs and several release cycles beyond Ron’s tenure. Adjacent national programmes have adopted the model. Ron continues in an advisory role: invited, not appointed.

What it teaches

The engagement is a case study in standards governance as a long-horizon craft. The point of a standards council is not to make good decisions this year; it is to make the pattern of decisions durable across decades. That requires designing the council for the moment its founder leaves the room.

Start the conversation

Bring national-scale rigour to your programme.

A short briefing is the fastest way to see whether the practice is a fit. Half an hour, no obligation, and you leave with two or three specific ideas.