Standards collaborative for a national digital-health authority
Design and stewardship of a multi-stakeholder standards council coordinating standards adoption across a national digital-health portfolio.
Role
Council chair (past) · continuing advisor
Region
North America
Period
2016 – present
Scale
National · multi-stakeholder
The programme
A national digital-health authority in North America needed a standing multi-stakeholder collaborative to coordinate standards adoption across a national portfolio spanning ministries, agencies, clinical professional bodies, and delivery organisations. The collaborative had to be authoritative enough for programmes to defer to and light enough not to strangle them.
The role
Ron served as founding chair of the collaborative and, after handing the chair to a successor, has continued as a senior advisor. The scope covered:
- charter design: decision rights, quorum, tie-break, appeal, publication;
- working-group structure: how technical work was actually done and how it fed into council decisions;
- release calendar: how the standards portfolio would be versioned, deprecated, and stewarded over time;
- successor development: recruiting and mentoring the next chair and vice-chair.
The craft
Two decisions worth naming:
- A short, published charter. The charter is under twenty pages. Every clause exists because a real dispute or a foreseeable dispute made it necessary. Nothing in it is decorative. Councils that need long charters usually die of them.
- Successor as a design goal. From the first day, the collaborative was designed to survive its founding chair. Vice-chairs were rotated. Working-group leads were rotated. Meeting facilitation was rotated. By year three the collaborative could operate without any single person in the room.
The outcome
The collaborative is still running today, several chairs and several release cycles beyond Ron’s tenure. Adjacent national programmes have adopted the model. Ron continues in an advisory role: invited, not appointed.
What it teaches
The engagement is a case study in standards governance as a long-horizon craft. The point of a standards council is not to make good decisions this year; it is to make the pattern of decisions durable across decades. That requires designing the council for the moment its founder leaves the room.
Also see
Related engagements
A G7 federated EHR blueprint
A decade-plus national reference architecture that steered ~CAD 2.1B of federated investment across sub-national jurisdictions.
Period
2003 – 2018
Scale
CAD 2.1B guided
Digital-health platform handbook for a UN specialised agency
Project lead and contributing editor for a global reference used by ministries and donors setting up national digital-health platforms.
Period
2014 – 2020
Scale
Used in 30+ countries
A South Asian national health-data blueprint
Ministry-facing architecture and interoperability plan supporting a population in the hundreds of millions.
Period
2019 – 2022
Scale
National · 100M+ population
Start the conversation
Bring national-scale rigour to your programme.
A short briefing is the fastest way to see whether the practice is a fit. Half an hour, no obligation, and you leave with two or three specific ideas.