Interoperability advisory to a US federal health programme
Independent expert review of a large-scale interoperability initiative serving veterans and their dependants.
Role
Independent expert advisor
Region
North America · US federal
Period
2018 – 2020
Scale
Federal · multi-million enrolees
The programme
A US federal health programme responsible for delivering care to a very large enrolled population of veterans and their dependants was mid-flight in a multi-year interoperability initiative. The programme needed independent architectural advice on standards trajectory, vendor engagement, and the governance of cross-agency data-sharing.
The role
Ron served as an independent expert advisor to the programme’s architecture leadership. The scope was deliberately narrow:
- assessment of the standards trajectory (HL7 v2, CDA, IHE profiles, emerging FHIR) against operational and cross-agency requirements;
- advice on the balance between in-house architecture capability and prime-integrator dependence;
- governance recommendations for the cross-agency data-sharing council.
The craft
Two things worth naming:
- A candid trajectory paper, not a re-plan. The deliverable was a short paper, under thirty pages, recommending a rebalancing of the standards trajectory toward FHIR-based patterns while preserving in-flight investments in CDA and IHE. It was written to be read by an executive, defended in an oversight forum, and referenced in subsequent procurements. It was not a wholesale re-plan; the existing plan was mostly sound.
- Governance as the load-bearing recommendation. The most consequential recommendation was not technical. It was about the decision rights of the cross-agency data-sharing council: who chaired it, who could bring items, how disputes were resolved. That recommendation was accepted and implemented.
The outcome
The recommendations were adopted by programme leadership. The trajectory paper became one of the reference documents cited in subsequent programme decisions and procurements.
What it teaches
The engagement is a case study in the value of a short, sharply argued independent paper at the right moment in a large programme. Sometimes the deliverable is not a re-plan; it is a page count small enough that an executive will actually read it.
Also see
Related engagements
A G7 federated EHR blueprint
A decade-plus national reference architecture that steered ~CAD 2.1B of federated investment across sub-national jurisdictions.
Period
2003 – 2018
Scale
CAD 2.1B guided
Digital-health platform handbook for a UN specialised agency
Project lead and contributing editor for a global reference used by ministries and donors setting up national digital-health platforms.
Period
2014 – 2020
Scale
Used in 30+ countries
A South Asian national health-data blueprint
Ministry-facing architecture and interoperability plan supporting a population in the hundreds of millions.
Period
2019 – 2022
Scale
National · 100M+ population
Start the conversation
Bring national-scale rigour to your programme.
A short briefing is the fastest way to see whether the practice is a fit. Half an hour, no obligation, and you leave with two or three specific ideas.